- The list of names is pretty weak. Some of these 80 guys have already been implicated through other avenues. Some people were missing like Sosa or even McGwire.
- The timespan of the players stretched back over a decade which means an average of 8 players a year were definitely doing steroids. Wow, big news.
- I was hoping for some bigger names too. Most of the guys listed aren't even ten-year guys let alone all-stars.
- The absence of Red Sox players is suspicious given that Mitchell is one of their board members.
- Also, isn't it ironic how the report stresses the need for an independent testing agency and implies the inherent benefits of such independence when an independent investigative body could have done a much better job of investigating steroids in baseball with the 20 million dollars the U.S. government wasted. Two journalists in San Fransisco did a more thorough and efficient job with less resources and power than a whole team of government men.
Thursday, December 13, 2007
the mitchell report
A lot can be said about what transpired earlier today. Here are a few of my thoughts.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I think the not naming of any Red Sox players had more to do with the only primary sources being two new york club house attendants and Jason Giambi. Mo Vaughn was named though. But Nomar should have been in there too - in my mind the circumstantial evidence points pretty clearly to him juicing.
The report is crap and Mitchell and Congress should be ashamed of themselves for wasting tax payers' money. Nothing surprising in it at all and, frankly, the lack of more names and the limited sources for the names they have destroy most of the credibility of the report.
George,
I actually thought about you when I saw the press conference on tv about this report. I knew you would have an opinion.
Post a Comment