Many of you know that for a while now I have been formulating a hypothesis of how to solve many of the issues that face us today. Part of my investigation centers around simple observation while much of it involves mixed media resources. Of these mixed media I am quite partial to documentaries. Typically these focus on historical events but they all pretty much have the same theme; life was hard, they dealt with it.
Part of my work has come to the conclusion that man has escaped the bounds of evolution and has actually transcended one of the basic premises of adaptations. My conclusion was that man, in order to maintain a stable gene pool, needs a predator of sorts. This predator could manifest in a disease or genetic shortcoming or even a species that preyed on humans. However, we would do well not to get hung up on the object of change as much as the process.
In a conversation with my wife this past weekend, we came to the revelation that a predator of such may not be the most ethical or moral thing to depend on. Perhaps we should look at Proactive Population Filtration (PPF) instead of individual removal. We came up with two plausible methods to this filtration:
First, the ability to breed should be a certification process whereas upon completion of a set criteria a participating couple would be allowed to procreate. This is fraught with possible short-comings such as how to stop breeding since quality child rearing is not a mandate for sexual reproduction. A solution would be to introduce a chemical sterilization to the municipal water sources to halt un-authorized procreation. Upon completion of previous mentioned criteria an antidote would be given to allow breeding to take place.
Second, castration would be used as a way to 'weed' out the gene pool of unwanted traits. Social outliers, substandard genetic makeup, people with green eyes would all be sterilized from procreation so as to save the population. As an example: Those who display 'Truck Nuts' as a sign of social inclusion would, in fact, lose theirs.
While neither methods encompasses all solutions, a proper mixture could be strategically used to combat many of the philological (and physiological) and socio problems that are rampant in our post-evulatory environment.
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
OK, maybe the joke's on me, but I don't geddit. I'm assuming this whole post is tongue-in-cheek?
I'm lost, what don't you understand?
Post a Comment